|
Poelzer v. HMTQ, Reasons for Judgment, B.C. Supreme Court (29/10/08)
Attorney General of Canada v. Sfetkopoulos et al, Reasons for Judgment of the Court, Federal Court of Appeal (27/10/08)
PHS Community Services Society v. Attorney General of Canada; Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU) v. Attorney General of Canada and Minister of Health for Canada:
The BC3 are three prominent marijuana reform activists who appear to have been targeted by the US DEA for their political advocacy. They are charged with selling marijuana seeds, a crime that in Canada has been punished by a fine, but which in the US carries a ten-year mandatory minimum jail sentence and the potential of life imprisonment. A Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty hearing is scheduled in BC Supreme Court on October 31, 2007, and the extradition hearing is set for November 5 - 8, 2007, although this hearing might be further adjourned.
Renee Boje Archive, including:
|
|
|
R.
v. Hill, Ruling on Voir Dire (12/10/05)
R.
v. Spencer, Ruling on Voir Dire (07/09/04)
R. v. Dunsdon (Watermelon) Provincial Court Reasons:
R.
v. Smith and Budda, Provincial Court Reasons (07/09/04)
Van
Vlymen v. Solicitor General of Canada, Federal Court Reasons
(03/08/04)
R.
v. Suderman, Provincial Court Reasons (26/03/04)
Langley
Township v. James, BC Supreme Court Reasons re plant nutrients
sign (05/01/04)
See the R. v. Caine Archive, including the Supreme Court of Canada Decisions (23/12/03) in:
R. v. Hornby Decisions:
Bill C-38 Contraventions Act, Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act
|
|
